McLaren CEO Zak Brown Criticizes FIA Over Exit of F1…

McLaren CEO Zak Brown Criticizes FIA Over Exit of F1…read more

McLaren CEO Zak Brown has voiced strong criticism towards the FIA following their decision to remove Johnny Herbert from his position as an F1 steward. The governing body announced that Herbert, a former Formula 1 driver and long-time commentator, would step down in 2025 after a mutual agreement was reached, citing a conflict between his stewarding duties and his role as an F1 pundit.

Herbert had long been a respected figure in the F1 paddock, not only for his career as a driver but also for his insightful commentary and stewarding experience. His dual roles as a media analyst and a race steward had made him a valuable asset, bringing unique expertise to his role in officiating races. However, the FIA’s decision to end his involvement as a steward has sparked a wave of controversy, with many questioning the rationale behind the move.

Zak Brown has been particularly vocal in his disapproval, emphasizing that the FIA’s decision was a blow to the sport’s governance. Brown stated that the governing body needed to be more transparent and consistent in its decision-making processes. He further explained that Herbert’s dual role did not diminish his ability to fairly assess race situations but rather enhanced his understanding of the sport from both a driver’s and a commentator’s perspective. Brown also highlighted the importance of retaining stewards who possess substantial experience and maintain an impartial approach, arguing that Herbert’s background as a former driver was an asset to the role.

In response to the backlash, the FIA has defended its decision, suggesting that having a dual role created a potential conflict of interest. The governing body argued that it was necessary to ensure that stewards could make unbiased decisions without any external influence or perceived bias. Despite this explanation, many in the F1 community have expressed doubts, with some believing that Herbert’s experience in both roles only strengthened his impartiality and understanding of the sport.

Herbert’s departure from his stewarding role has reignited concerns about the FIA’s stewarding process, which has been frequently criticized for inconsistencies in race decisions. In the past, the governing body’s decision-making has been questioned over perceived inconsistencies and controversial penalties. The move to remove Herbert could exacerbate these concerns, especially as the 2025 season looms closer.

The FIA’s handling of steward appointments is now under intense scrutiny, with teams, drivers, and fans alike wondering who will replace Herbert and whether the new appointments will bring the same level of experience and understanding to the table. The governing body’s decision could have broader implications for the future of race officiating, as the need for stewards who have deep knowledge of the sport and can make unbiased judgments becomes ever more critical.

As the F1 community prepares for the upcoming season, the debate over the FIA’s decision to remove Johnny Herbert continues to spark discussions about the role of stewards, the potential conflicts of interest, and the overall transparency of governance in Formula 1.